Germany massively expands federal police powers
The German government has expanded the powers of its federal police, especially in the use of surveillance, AI, and drone defenses. But experts warn of
The German government has expanded the powers of its federal police, especially in the use of surveillance, AI, and drone defenses. But experts warn of constitutional challenges. The German Bundestag last week approved a new law that significantly expands the powers of the federal police by providing the scope to use drones, artificial intelligence, and increased surveillance of telecommunications. The law also makes it easier to incarcerate immigrants due for deportation. The government argued that the law — the first new federal police law in Germany since 1994 — is essential to keep up with technological developments, and the changing nature of threats to public safety. But according to critics, the federal police's rollout of mass surveillance will mean that technologies and databases that until now have only been used by state police forces, or for individual operations, could be used consistently across the whole country. Human rights and digital privacy advocates say the law brings significant risks to democratic freedoms and is likely to be challenged before Germany's Constitutional Court. Nevertheless, those legal challenges can take many years and the new law can be implemented in the meantime. Left Party MP Clara Bünger called the bill a step toward authoritarianism and a surveillance state that would weaken fundamental rights Image: dts Nachrichtenagentur/IMAGO Real-time AI-supported surveillance Maybe the most significant element of the new Federal Police Law is that it allows the use of AI-supported facial recognition surveillance in public spaces where the federal police have jurisdiction (airports, intercity railway stations, and near Germany's borders). The federal police will also be allowed to use "behavior recognition" on surveillance footage, an AI system that is supposed to be able to assess if a figure in a crowd is acting in a threatening or otherwise conspicuous way — by throwing a punch, for example. If such behavior is recognized the AI system can alert officers directly. This was particularly criticized by opposition parties during the Bundestag debate last week.
"Imagine this: Your train is two hours late... and you're angry, pacing back and forth on the platform in frustration. To the AI, this is a 'suspicious lingering behavior.' It thinks you're a pickpocket," said the socialist Left Party's Clara Bünger, to much jeering from the government parties' representatives. Police unions have welcomed this measure, partly because it could relieve pressure on manpower, but it is seen as controversial by digital rights activists, who say it creates the infrastructure for mass surveillance. "That's a real breach of the dam, because it more or less suspends anonymity in public spaces," Michael Kolain, head of policy at the Berlin-based Center for Digital Rights and Democracy, told DW. "These are measures that we know from China, from Iran, from Russia, but which are extremely unusual for German circumstances." Europe's answer to Palantir? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Markus Thiel, professor of public law at the German Police University in Münster, said he could understand such concerns. "But I think that's always a bit of a reflex," he said. "Whenever police powers are extended, there are always certain organizations and groups who are very critical of it. They have some justification, because especially these AI-supported measures always include the possibility of serious breaches of basic rights." That is especially the case because it is impossible for citizens to know how their data is being read and processed by AI surveillance technology — and in Germany people are supposed to have a right to access their data and find out how it is used. "That's why it's very important that such regulations are formulated to conform with basic rights," said Thiel. "I can understand the criticism, but I also think that we need these instruments. I consider them basically unproblematic, as long as they are formulated well." But activists are also concerned because the new law also gives the police more scope to use surveillance software in end-user devices for what the government calls "preventative surveillance." "That, of course, brings the danger that sensitive data is suddenly in the hands of the security forces," said Kolain.
The BriefWire