Explained: Why Trump dropped his 20% Hormuz fee proposal and how he contradicted his own aides
US President Donald Trump, on 14 July, backtracked from his proposal to impose a 20 per cent fee on cargo passing through the Strait of
US President Donald Trump, on 14 July, backtracked from his proposal to impose a 20 per cent fee on cargo passing through the Strait of Hormuz. Instead, President Trump said the United States would pursue trade and investment agreements with Gulf countries to offset the costs of securing the strategic waterway. Also Read | India among 5 nations facing tariffs under US Russia sanctions bill “Based on highly productive conversations with Middle East leadership, I have decided to replace the 20% United States Reimbursement Fee with Trade and Investment Deals that the various Gulf States will be making into the United States…” he posted on Truth Social. Quick answers to key questions • 5 QUESTIONS 1 What prompted Trump to drop the proposal for a 20% fee on cargo through the Strait of Hormuz? ⌵ Trump replaced the 20% fee proposal with trade and investment agreements with Gulf countries, stating that these agreements would offset the costs of securing the strategic waterway. 2 Why was Trump's original 20% fee plan met with criticism? ⌵ The fee was criticized for its potential legal issues, lack of clarity on implementation, and the burden it would place on shipping costs, which could lead to higher oil prices. 3 How did international law play a role in Trump's fee proposal? ⌵ International maritime law generally prohibits a single country from imposing fees on vessels using international waterways, making Trump's plan legally questionable, as emphasized by his aides. 4 What were the reactions of shipping companies to Trump's initial toll proposal? ⌵ Shipping companies and experts criticized the fee as 'fundamentally wrong,' arguing it would deter vessels from using the Strait and complicate maritime trade. 5 Should the US impose fees for security in international waterways like the Strait of Hormuz? ⌵ Imposing fees raises significant legal and diplomatic concerns, as established international norms dictate that passages in international waterways should be toll-free to ensure free navigation. The reversal came just a day after floating the idea. What was Trump’s original plan? Trump had proposed charging a 20 per cent fee on cargo passing through the Strait of Hormuz, arguing that the US was bearing the cost of keeping one of the world's busiest maritime chokepoints open.
Trump’s fee threat had sparked criticism from experts and analysts, especially given the lack of clarity on how the proposed fee would be implemented or calculated. Roughly one-fifth of global oil trade moves through the Strait of Hormuz. Any additional transit costs could have raised shipping expenses, pushed up oil prices and affected major energy importers, including India. India is a large importer of energy, and around 40 per cent of its crude oil imports, 60 per cent of its LNG imports, and a whopping 90 per cent of its liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) imports came from West Asia through the Strait of Hormuz, according to Indian Express report. What was Trump’s reversal justification? President Trump said he had held ‘very productive conversations’ with leaders in the Middle East and concluded that long-term trade and investment deals would be more beneficial than charging ships a transit fee. He argued that Gulf countries were willing to invest heavily in the US economy, making a toll unnecessary. Yet it is unclear why Trump backtracked so quickly from his announcement. What about legal hurdles? The Strait of Hormuz is an international waterway, and maritime law generally does not allow a single country to impose transit fees on ships using such sea lanes. The International Maritime Organisation (IMO), the UN's shipping agency, had already opposed the proposal, saying no country should charge for passage through an international strait. “We have always been consistent on our stance on fees – IMO stands firmly against charging fees for passage through straits used for international navigation. There is no legal basis through which to introduce mandatory tolls simply to transit through a strait,” an IMO spokesperson was quoted as saying in media reports. Major shipping companies also criticised the plan. German container shipping giant Hapag-Lloyd called the proposed fee "fundamentally wrong", arguing that commercial shipping should not bear the costs of geopolitical conflicts, according to news agency Reuters. Reports also indicated that Gulf governments were caught off guard by Trump's original announcement. Many Gulf nations are close US security partners and depend heavily on uninterrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
The BriefWire