Bazball ends with a whimper to expose emptiness of English men’s cricket | Jonathan Liew
Trent Bridge was not just the end of Ben Stokes’ international career, it was further confirmation that the Bazball project stood for nothing By the
Trent Bridge was not just the end of Ben Stokes’ international career, it was further confirmation that the Bazball project stood for nothing By the very end, Trent Bridge was practically empty. This felt bleakly appropriate. If the age of Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum lived by re-engaging a sceptical public, winning big series, doing the unprecedented and elevating Test cricket above its three-an-over purgatory, then this was exactly how it had to die: the first England team in history to lose a home three-match series after being 1-0 up.
The run rate on that final day? Exactly three runs an over. But then if we have learned anything from Stokes and McCullum over the last few years, it is that details like preparing for an Ashes tour are for losers and weak men. Is demoting Emilio Gay to No 6 in his third game really the best way of saving a Test?
Was there a way for Harry Brook to face more than nine balls in England’s second innings? Can we really expect a Brook side – Hazball
– to behave any differently? But these questions do not concern the England management, and so by extension they should not concern you either. Continue reading...
