Mexico’s Victory Over Ecuador Made the Ground Shake. Was It an Artificial Earthquake?
The ground literally shook after the two goals that secured Mexico’s victory over Ecuador in round of 32 of the 2026 World Cup. Mexico’s Digital
The ground literally shook after the two goals that secured Mexico’s victory over Ecuador in round of 32 of the 2026 World Cup. Mexico’s Digital Platform for Early Warning and Comprehensive Risk Management (SASSLA) reported that the fans’ celebrations following goals by Julián Quiñones and Raúl Jiménez caused “a significant artificial signal” recorded by a Raspberry Shake seismograph located near the Mexico City Stadium. The seismic alert system noted on its social media accounts that “the outburst of euphoria and mass cheering produced vibrations in the local area.” A similar phenomenon occurred during Mexico’s debut against Germany at the 2018 World Cup in Russia, when Mexico’s Institute of Geological and Atmospheric Research reported that, following Hirving Lozano’s winning goal a seismic signal of artificial origin was detected, “possibly caused by mass jumping” by the fans. The phenomenon can even occur thousands of miles from where matches being played: Geophysicists detected a quake in Bergen, Norway, when the country's team scored goals in the knockout rounds last week.
Something similar happened in 2024, when a Taylor Swift concert at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles generated long-duration, low-frequency signals—with harmonic frequency peaks between 1 and 10 Hz—detected by seismic monitoring sensors. 2026 FIFA World Cup Here’s WIRED’s complete guide to the 2026 FIFA World Cup. For several years now, the term “artificial earthquake” has been used to describe this type of atypical vibration recorded by seismological systems during sporting events or large-scale performances. However, various experts believe that the term is not the most appropriate way to describe this type of phenomenon. First, it should be clarified that artificial earthquakes do exist and have been the subject of study for decades. Research by the geosciences department at Durham University defines them as “human-induced earthquakes,” caused by activities capable of altering the geological behavior of the ground, such as the construction of high-rise buildings, groundwater extraction, tunnel excavation, enhanced oil recovery, hydraulic fracturing (fracking), or underground gas storage.
Under this definition, the vibrations detected by the SASSLA systems following the Mexican team’s goals cannot be considered an “artificial earthquake.” Experts explain that, for ground movement to be classified as an earthquake, it must be associated with a geological process. The mere fact that a seismograph records a disturbance does not mean it can be classified as an earthquake. Arturo Iglesias, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics at the Autonomous University of Mexico, explained several years ago that, although human activity generates movements capable of being recorded by seismographs, this does not imply that they are actual geological phenomena that can be measured using seismic magnitudes or cause changes in the subsurface. Iglesias added that seismic monitoring systems are capable of detecting micro-movements in the ground, whether of natural origin or resulting from human activities. He also noted that their readings can be influenced by factors such as the location of the stations, the characteristics of the terrain, or the intensity of certain activities taking place on the surface.
The BriefWire