Have World Cup changes made final group stage games unfair?
The group stage of the 2026 World Cup always felt as though it might lack jeopardy. After all, with 32 of 48 teams advancing to
The group stage of the 2026 World Cup always felt as though it might lack jeopardy. After all, with 32 of 48 teams advancing to the knockout rounds it is more difficult to be eliminated than to qualify. But the impact of two key changes are perhaps only now being realised by fans as the second round of matches comes to an end. They are the first ever World Cup using head-to-head records instead of goal difference as the primary tiebreaker for countries level on points.
And the second is this World Cup will feature a third-placed table for the first time since 1994 as teams vie for the eight remaining slots. Head-to-head means teams can either win a group or be eliminated after two games. Eight teams already know they have nothing to play for on the third matchday. For instance, Argentina have six points and cannot be overtaken in Group J because they have beaten the two teams on three points, Austria and Algeria.
Likewise, Jordan on zero points have been eliminated because they have lost to those two teams. If goal difference were being used first every team would still have something on the line. Will countries with nothing to play for field weaker teams in their final game as a result? As for the third-placed table, because there are so many groups it takes five days to complete the final round of matches. That means, for example, when Scotland play Brazil on Wednesday (23:00 BST) they will have no idea what the cut-off in terms of a points threshold will be to go through in third.
A team playing on Saturday or Sunday will likely know exactly what they require. All in all, the final week of the group stage is going to feel very different.
The BriefWire