Just stare at a wall: UK girl's hilarious take on social media ban for children
A British schoolgirl’s blunt reply to a BBC reporter — that she would "stare at a wall" if social media was taken away — has
A British schoolgirl’s blunt reply to a BBC reporter — that she would "stare at a wall" if social media was taken away — has become one of the defining reactions to the UK government’s sweeping plan to ban social media access for children under 16. The moment came during a BBC interview with high school student Isabella after Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that Britain would move to prohibit under-16s from using major social media platforms from spring next year. Read Full Story Asked how she would spend the extra time created by no longer being on social media, Isabella’s answer was brief and unexpectedly blunt. Excerpts from the interview Interviewer: What was your screen time over the weekend? Isabella: Nine hours Interviewer: Nine hours. So suddenly, you're going to have a lot more time to fill. And what will you do? Isabella: Stare at a wall. Interviewer: Stare at a wall. OK. Tell me how you felt when you heard the Prime Minister say, ‘No more social media for you’. Isabella: I didn't think it would actually happen.
I kind of believed that he would chicken out of it and give it more time or more consideration. But he seems pretty sure of it. And I'm not sure if I agree with him. She later explained that her main concern was losing contact with friends and family, saying social media for her was largely a communication tool rather than simply entertainment, the BBC reported. The clip quickly spread online, attracting millions of views and thousands of reactions, with many users interpreting the exchange as an illustration of how deeply embedded social media has become in teenagers’ daily lives. Starmer announced the policy as part of what ministers described as a major intervention to protect children’s wellbeing online. "We are banning social media access for under 16s," Starmer said while unveiling the proposal. Britain has become the fourth country to pursue such restrictions, after Australia, Indonesia and Malaysia. Australia introduced the world’s first full social media ban for under-16s in December 2025. The UK’s approach, described by officials as an "Australia-plus" model, is expected to extend beyond simply blocking social media accounts.
According to government plans under consideration, restrictions could include limits on livestreaming, tighter controls preventing children from interacting with strangers through gaming apps and potential social media curfews. Platforms expected to be covered include Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and X, while messaging services such as WhatsApp and Signal are not expected to fall under the ban. The decision follows a government consultation that received more than 1,16,000 responses. Among parents and carers surveyed, nearly nine in ten supported a legal minimum age for social media access, with a strong majority backing an age threshold below 16. BRITAIN’S ROYALS SUPPORT BAN The proposal has also received support from Prince Harry and Meghan, who described the move as “a welcome step forward”. In a statement, the couple said online platforms should prioritise “children’s wellbeing ahead of engagement and profit”, adding: “The burden cannot rest solely on parents and children. It must also be borne by the companies.” Supporters of the policy argue that growing evidence links excessive social media use to poorer outcomes among children and adolescents.
The BriefWire