The US border runs straight through the World Cup

Published 13 June 2026 · sports

The 2026 World Cup promised continental unity. Instead, it has exposed the violence and hypocrisy of Fortress America. On June 11, the FIFA World Cup

The 2026 World Cup promised continental unity. Instead, it has exposed the violence and hypocrisy of Fortress America. On June 11, the FIFA World Cup 2026 kicked off in Mexico, which, along with the United States and Canada, is cohosting this year’s tournament in an ostensible display of continental unity. From the get-go, the whole shared hosting concept was rather ludicrous, given that one of the hosts is particularly bad at playing with others. For starters, the US maintains a system of overzealous visa restrictions and “travel bans” for citizens of an array of nations, which renders an already socioeconomically exclusive event even more so and shatters the illusion of international camaraderie that the World Cup is supposed to embody. The US also presides over an insanely militarised frontier with cohost Mexico, a country US commander-in-chief Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to bomb and invade. In other unsportsmanlike behaviour, Trump has referred to Mexicans as criminals, drug dealers and rapists; in 2019, The New York Times reported his suggestion that US soldiers shoot migrants and that an alligator-filled moat be installed along the border. Upon reassuming office last year, Trump in effect closed the US border to asylum seekers and economic refugees, a charming move, seeing as the US is responsible for much of the global upheaval that forces folks to migrate in the first place. A young man I know from the violence-racked Mexican state of Michoacan recently found himself obliged to pay $10,000 to a coyote, or migrant smuggler, to have himself hoisted by rope over the border fence into the US, once life at home no longer appeared financially or physically sustainable. In other words, while some inhabitants of the globe are dropping $10,000 or more on World Cup tickets, this young man had to scrape together the same funds for a shot at fleeing a US-fuelled panorama of poverty and bloodshed in Mexico.

For its part, Mexico’s decision to cohost an abominably expensive tournament – rather than devote such vast resources to, say, tracking down the country’s more than 134,000 disappeared persons – has been seen as a slap in the face by many Mexicans. Most of the disappearances took place following the US-backed launch of the so-called “war on drugs” in 2006, which has amounted to a war on the poor. The massive deployment around World Cup venues of Mexican security forces, notorious for human rights abuses and other repression, has also rubbed many people the wrong way. Meanwhile, FIFA’s lengthy history of corruption, greed, hypocrisy and assorted other vices has been dutifully upheld by the organisation’s president, Gianni Infantino, who in December presented Trump with the very first “FIFA Peace Prize – Football Unites the World”. The prize was apparently spontaneously invented by Infantino in a shameless act of brown-nosing to coax Trump out of his tantrum at having been denied the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize. And who better to receive the inaugural FIFA award than the number one backer of Israel’s genocide in the Gaza Strip? Since October 2023, Israel has officially killed some 73,000 Palestinians in Gaza, including at least 421 footballers. In the months following Infantino’s boot-licking stunt, the FIFA Peace Prize recipient would go on to “unite the world” by, inter alia, kidnapping the president of Venezuela, co-launching an apocalyptic war on Iran with Israel, and helping to finance Israel’s renewed pulverisation and occupation of south Lebanon. And while World Cup cohost Canada likes to portray itself as simply the innocent northern neighbour of the United States, the country’s own complicity in genocide and arms transfers to Israel means it has racked up its fair share of moral red cards, too. The US, though, is the main force out to ensure that this year’s World Cup is as divisive and joyless as possible.