Sam Bankman-Fried loses appeal to overturn fraud convictions and prison
If the former crypto billionaire loses all remaining avenues, he would be eligible for release in 2044. crypto tycoon Sam Bankman-Fried has lost his bid
If the former crypto billionaire loses all remaining avenues, he would be eligible for release in 2044. crypto tycoon Sam Bankman-Fried has lost his bid to overturn his fraud conviction and 25-year prison sentence over the collapse of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange he founded. In a unanimous decision on Friday, a three-judge panel of the Manhattan-based 2nd United States Circuit Court of Appeals said prosecutorsâ evidence against Bankman-Fried âwas, conservatively stated, robustâ. âWhile he was publicly reassuring customers, investors and regulators that FTX customer funds were safe, he was simultaneously using FTX as his own personal piggy bank, spending customer funds on real estate, political contributions, and investments,â Circuit Judge Barrington Parker wrote on behalf of the panel. Bankman-Friedâs lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment. They may next ask all the active judges on the 2nd Circuit to hear the case, or ask the US Supreme Court to take up the case.
Bankman-Fried is also seeking a pardon from US President Donald Trump, according to the Department of Justiceâs Office of the Pardon Attorney. Neither the White House nor the Justice Department immediately responded to requests for comment. While it is not clear if that would happen, Trump, last year, did pardon another crypto tycoon, Changpeng Zhao, founder of the giant Binance cryptocurrency exchange, who was convicted of violating US money-laundering laws. âFraud of epic proportionsâ Bankman-Fried, who had been one of the cryptocurrency sectorâs most influential figures and a multibillionaire before FTXâs spectacular collapse in 2022, was found guilty on seven felony charges by a federal jury in Manhattan in 2023. Prosecutors with the Manhattan US Attorneyâs Office said he stole $8bn from FTX customers to plug losses at his crypto-focused hedge fund, Alameda Research, in what they termed a âfraud of epic proportionsâ.
Bankman-Fried had pleaded not guilty to the two counts of fraud and five counts of conspiracy that he faced. At his trial, he admitted to making mistakes running FTX, but testified that he never stole funds. In appealing the conviction, Bankman-Friedâs defence lawyers argued that US District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who oversaw the trial, improperly prevented Bankman-Fried from introducing evidence to back up his belief that FTX had enough funds to cover customer withdrawals. The appeals court disagreed, pointing to legal precedent holding that fraud occurs the moment a defendant tricks someone into handing over money or property, even if the defendant intends to eventually make the victim whole. âFTX customers were defrauded as soon as Bankman-Fried transferred their money to Alameda regardless of how strongly he believed he might later return the money,â Parker wrote.
