Delhi High Court grants bail to Kashmir human-rights activist Khuram Parvez in UAPA case
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday (June 10, 2026) granted bail to Kashmiri human rights activist Khuram Parvez in a case under the anti-terror law
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday (June 10, 2026) granted bail to Kashmiri human rights activist Khuram Parvez in a case under the anti-terror law. Also Read: Global rights bodies call for release of Kashmir-based activist Khurram Parvez A bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja took note of Mr. Parvez's over-four-year incarceration in the case and the unlikelihood of the trial concluding soon to hold that his rights under Article 21 of the Constitution trumped the restriction on bail under section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The bench further observed that, having lost his leg in a landmine blast in 2004, the accused is infirm and deserves "special consideration". The court set aside a trial court's December 2024 order rejecting Mr. Parvez's bail plea and ordered, "We direct that the appellant be released on bail in RC No. 30/2021/NIA/DLI, P.S. NIA, in NIA/4/2022 on conditions." The court asked Mr. Parvez to surrender his passport, not to leave Delhi without the trial court’s permission, and to regularly report to the investigating officer. It also directed him not to make any public statement on the case or participate in activities prejudicial to public order or the trial's integrity, or "upload/share/disseminate or circulate any anti-national material". Parvez, the programme coordinator of the Jammu and Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society and the chairperson of the Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances, was arrested by the Investigation Agency (NIA) on November 22, 2021.
The NIA had alleged that under the guise of human-rights activism, Mr. Parvez conspired with a Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) operative to run a network of overground workers (OGWs) for furthering the activities of the Pakistan-based terrorist organisation and committing terror acts in India. It had been alleged that Mr. Parvez was actively involved in collecting information regarding the movement of Army vehicles near the Line of Control (LoC), road conditions and details of Army camps, structures of the Army, paramilitary and police etc. The NIA has charge-sheeted Mr. Parvez for several offences, including under sections 13 (punishment for unlawful activities), 18 (punishment for conspiracy etc.), 18B (punishment for recruiting of any person or persons for terrorist act), 38 (offence relating to membership of a terrorist organisation) and 39 (offence relating to support given to a terrorist organisation) of the UAPA and other sections under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Indian Penal Code. Opposing the bail plea, the NIA contended in the High Court that material shows that the case against the human-rights activist is founded on overt acts, including recruitment of OGWs for the LeT, transmission of intelligence to a Pakistan-based handler, active orchestration of public violence, possession of targeting lists of Indian Army personnel, and corrupt engagement with a former NIA officer. The NIA counsel emphasised that Mr. Parvez is a flight risk, instigated protests after the encounter of Burhan Wani, and his past antecedents included five other cases involving similar secessionist and terrorist activities.
The BriefWire