AI will reshape jobs, but India’s bigger challenge is preparing workers, boardrooms and classrooms

Published 6 June 2026 · tech

The debate around artificial intelligence has largely been framed around a single question: Will it take away jobs? But at The Hindu Huddle’s session on

The debate around artificial intelligence has largely been framed around a single question: Will it take away jobs? But at The Hindu Huddle’s session on “I, Robot: How AI is reshaping the future of work”, industry veterans argued that India risks missing a far more important conversation — how to redesign education, skilling, research, and businesses for an AI-led future. Also Read: The Hindu Huddle 2026 Day 2 Updates The panel, moderated by Businessline editor Raghuvir Srinivasan, brought together former Cognizant CEO Lakshmi Narayanan, former NASSCOM president and NITI Aayog distinguished fellow Debjani Ghosh, and former Saint-Gobain India chairman B. Santhanam. For Ms. Ghosh, the current narrative around AI-driven job losses is often misplaced. “A lot of the displacements till now were due to overhiring during the pandemic. So it was correction that was happening,” she said, pushing back against the view that AI is already eliminating large numbers of jobs. That does not mean the risks are insignificant. As AI systems become capable of performing routine and repetitive tasks, entry-level jobs are likely to come under the greatest pressure. “The entry-level will definitely get disrupted. And that is important because that’s millions of people in India and millions of youngsters in India,” Ms. Ghosh said.

The challenge, she argued, is not to resist AI but to redesign work around it. Rather than viewing jobs as fixed roles, employers and policymakers need to break them down into tasks and identify the areas that can be automated and those which continue to require human judgement. That future, she said, will be defined by what she called the “human sandwich model”. “You need the humans to frame the questions and inputs, AI does the work, and then you need humans again at the end to verify the outcome,” she said, adding that the model will become even more critical as autonomous AI agents become commonplace. The conversation soon moved beyond jobs to India’s place in the global AI economy. While India has emerged as one of the world’s largest digital markets, Ms. Ghosh warned that being a consumer of technology is not the same as creating value from it. “If you look at the 17.6 trillion prediction of how much value AI will create in the next five years, 80% of that is going to two countries, the U.S. and China. For India, we should at least aspire to get 10% of that,” she said.

Santhanam, however, believes India’s biggest opportunity may not lie in competing head-on with Silicon Valley’s frontier models. Instead, he argued that the country can create disproportionate impact through the diffusion of AI across sectors such as agriculture, education and healthcare. “The most important work is in diffusion in these three areas — agriculture, education and health. That’s where I think AI can do what humans cannot do,” he said. He pointed to examples where AI-powered solutions developed for Indian agricultural ecosystems were adapted for use elsewhere within months, highlighting the country’s ability to deploy technology at scale. Yet Mr. Santhanam reserved his sharpest criticism for corporate India. “In the Nifty 45, there are 230 independent directors. Less than 10% of them have any understanding or knowledge of technology. That’s the state of our boards,” he said. The lack of engagement with AI at the board level, he argued, is particularly concerning at a time when the technology is rapidly transforming industries. “Not one company in the managing director’s report had AI mentioned. Not one. That’s shocking.” Narayanan echoed concerns about India’s preparedness, particularly in education and research. Asked whether Indian colleges are producing graduates ready for the AI era, his answer was blunt.