Fan Backlash Or Green Initiative: Why FIFA Abandoned Its World Cup Plastic Bottle Ban

Published 6 June 2026 · sports

Fan Backlash Or Green Initiative: Why FIFA Abandoned Its World Cup Plastic Bottle Ban Published By, Last Updated: June 06, 2026, 17:52 IST FIFA eases

Fan Backlash Or Green Initiative: Why FIFA Abandoned Its World Cup Plastic Bottle Ban Published By, Last Updated: June 06, 2026, 17:52 IST FIFA eases its World Cup water rules, allowing one sealed disposable bottle per fan in US and Canada after criticism over heat risks, while still banning hard reusable containers. FIFA eases its World Cup water rules, allowing one sealed disposable bottle per fan in US and Canada after criticism over heat risks, while still banning hard reusable containers. (Credit: AFP) FIFA has partially reversed its controversial water bottle policy for the 2026 FIFA World Cup after facing criticism from fans, health experts and politicians over concerns about spectator welfare during matches in North America. The governing body announced that spectators attending World Cup matches in the United States and Canada will now be allowed to bring one factory-sealed disposable plastic water bottle of up to 20 ounces (590 ml) into stadiums.

The clarification comes days after FIFA updated its stadium regulations to prohibit reusable water bottles. Under the earlier policy, fans had been permitted to carry empty, transparent reusable bottles with a capacity of up to one litre, which could be refilled inside venues. The revised rules sparked widespread criticism, particularly because the tournament is expected to be played during the peak summer months when several host cities could experience extreme heat. Fan groups and public health experts warned that restricting access to personal water containers could increase the risk of dehydration and heat-related illnesses among spectators. FIFA’s Chief Operating Officer for the 2026 World Cup, Heimo Schirgi, defended the decision, saying the restriction on reusable bottles was based on security concerns. “What is not allowed are hard-sided resealable water containers, which could pose a safety and security risk," Schirgi said. The controversy also drew political attention. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer criticised the policy, arguing that it unfairly burdened fans already paying high prices to attend matches.

“It’s just wrong," Starmer said during an interview with LBC Radio. “I can’t help but think that it’s about making money." He questioned why supporters would be prevented from bringing their own water into stadiums while being able to purchase bottled water inside at significantly higher prices. The issue has reignited concerns about spectator welfare ahead of the expanded 2026 World Cup, which will be jointly hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico. Several matches are scheduled to take place in cities known for high summer temperatures, prompting calls for stronger heat-protection measures for both players and fans. Last year’s FIFA Club World Cup in the United States allowed supporters to carry empty reusable bottles into venues, while bottled water was also available for purchase inside stadiums. Following the backlash, FIFA’s latest decision is being viewed as a compromise, allowing fans to carry a limited amount of water while maintaining restrictions on reusable containers that organisers say could present security risks.