Why Netanyahuâs âcoupâ against Gaza plan risks endless war
The Israeli leaderâs rejection of a US-led roadmap threatens to entrench a state of conflict, analysts say. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahuâs rejection of a
The Israeli leaderâs rejection of a US-led roadmap threatens to entrench a state of conflict, analysts say. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahuâs rejection of a United States-led roadmap for Gaza has raised urgent questions about the fragile peace process and the prolonging of suffering for more than two million Palestinians in the territory. The US-brokered 15-point plan mandates that Hamas would disarm in exchange for a phased Israeli military withdrawal and the transition of governance to a technocratic Palestinian committee backed by an international security force. Since US President Donald Trump announced his peace plan for Gaza last year, Israel has continued near-daily deadly attacks in violation of a âceasefireâ deal. Rather than deploying its forces, it now maintains military control of more than 70 percent of the Strip. And on Sunday, just weeks before Israelâs crucial elections, Netanyahu effectively paralysed the diplomatic process by insisting that Israeli troops will not withdraw until Hamas is âgenuinely disarmedâ. In Gaza, Netanyahuâs declaration sent shockwaves, extinguishing recent optimism and raising the prospect of intense attacks. âThere is a form of fear, unfortunately, because the matter is linked to Netanyahu possibly undertaking steps to return to assassination operations, bombing operations and targeting operations near the yellow areas,â said Gaza-based political analyst Eyad al-Qarra, referring to the unilaterally imposed âYellow Lineâ, the effective Israeli buffer zone squeezing Palestinians into smaller areas. The Gaza Government Media Office echoed the grim outlook, viewing the rejection as a deliberate tactic to continue the war. âThese positions represent a clear and explicit coup against the negotiation path and its outcomes, deliberately obstruct the path to calm, and greatly reinforce the state of humanitarian deterioration,â it said in a statement.
The office added that Netanyahuâs statement proves Israel âtakes the negotiation path as a false political cover to buy time, pass its destructive projects, and continue the war of genocide against defenceless civilians.â The rejection places the US-brokered ceasefire on the brink of total collapse. Following Netanyahuâs statement, Hamas affirmed its commitment to the diplomatic process under the US-led Board of Peace and International Stabilization Force while demanding accountability. âWe call on the mediators, the guarantors, and the Board of Peace to assume their responsibilities, ensure the commitment of all parties to what was agreed upon, and prevent any breaches or violations that would disrupt the implementation path or undermine the ceasefire agreement,â it said in a statement. Al-Qarra warned that if mediators fail to pressure Israel, Palestinians might face âthe worst option, which is announcing practically the end of these negotiations after Netanyahuâs rejection and coup against themâ. âRed lineâ As the implications for Gazaâs future become apparent, the diplomatic fallout has triggered a sharp regional backlash. Egyptâs Foreign Minister, Badr Abdelatty, warned that the threat of forced displacement of Gazaâs population remains actively on the table. âThe so-called âvoluntary displacementâ cannot be considered voluntary if they create conditions that make life inside the Strip impossible,â Abdelatty said in statements carried by Egyptian media, stressing that pushing the population to leave under such conditions is a âred lineâ for Egypt, Arab and Islamic countries. Abdelatty emphasised that Egypt âwill not accept and will not allowâ displacement to occur, while also criticising the failure to implement the first phase of the agreement, including achieving the minimum target of 600 aid trucks entering Gaza daily.
