NEET paper ‘leak’ case: CBI charge sheet cites evidence from access control app of NTA expert’s society, phone records
The Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) charge sheet against 13 arrested accused persons in the NEET-UG 2026 paper ‘leak’ case, rests on a mountain of
The Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) charge sheet against 13 arrested accused persons in the NEET-UG 2026 paper ‘leak’ case, rests on a mountain of digital forensic evidence, including an access control app of a residential society in Pune where Testing Agency chemistry expert and accused P.V. Kulkarni lived, officials said. All of the accused are currently in judicial custody. In its charge sheet filed before a special CBI court in New Delhi on July 28, the agency has cited records collected from the app of Mr. Kulkarni's society, including the biometrics of students who were coming for special coaching classes conducted by him. The app is used for controlling and recording the entry and exit of visitors in gated housing societies, among other things. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) used the records to corroborate the presence of students and their parents in the society in April, days before NEET-UG 2026 took place on May 3, when Mr. Kulkarni was in Pune, which was further buttressed by the call data records (CDR) and location analysis of their phones.
Experts exploited ‘procedural gaps’ in the NTA At the centre of the CBI charge sheet are three Pune-based subject experts on the panel of the Testing Agency (NTA) — Mr. Kulkarni for chemistry, Manisha Gurunath Mandhare for zoology and botany, and Manisha Sanjay Havaldar for physics — who allegedly exploited profound procedural gaps in the NTA to leak confidential questions for huge monetary considerations. The CBI zeroed in on the experts through a beautician, Manisha Sanjay Waghmare, who had circulated the papers to aspirants as far as Rajasthan and Haryana through a chain of middlemen, exposing the paper leak and leading to a subsequent complaint to the NTA. Waghmare had planted students in the special coaching classes conducted in April by Mr. Kulkarni and Ms. Mandhare and collected their notebooks, on which the questions dictated by the duo were scribbled, with some highlighted portions marked important and very important. The CBI also noticed the role of Ms. Havaldar, who had provided 16 pages of physics questions containing 68 questions to the mother of an aspirant at the instance of Ms. Mandhare, the officials said.
The agency sent all the material collected from the leaked papers recovered from various aspirants and middlemen to an expert panel constituted by Delhi University, which showed that a major chunk of the material matched four sets of papers for NEET-UG 26 — Kailash, Shivalik, Set 2, Set 3 — in varying degrees. It also showed that sets to which the experts had access had the highest number of matches, up to 85%, while the sets to which they were not given access had the fewest matches, the officials said. Paper setting done in the NTA building in Okhla The CBI has found that paper setting, translations and back translation were done in the NTA building in Okhla in a sanitised environment where several lapses were identified, which were exploited by Mr. Kulkarni, Ms. Mandhare and Ms. Havaldar to reconstruct the material for the NEET question paper when they were back in their hotel rooms. Kulkarni allegedly used the rough sheets to smuggle small chits of questions in brief and optional answers.
The BriefWire