Intention is to destabilise country: Nishikant Dubey seeks Zuckerberg’s apology over restricting PM’s Facebook post

Published 3 August 2026 · tech

Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications and Information Technology chairperson Nishikant Dubey on Monday (August 3, 2026) demanded an apology from Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg over

Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications and Information Technology chairperson Nishikant Dubey on Monday (August 3, 2026) demanded an apology from Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg over the brief restriction of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Facebook post and warned that the social media company could face action if accountability was not fixed. Addressing reporters after a meeting of the committee, Mr. Dubey alleged that the incident reflected a pattern of conduct by Meta and questioned the company’s handling of content on its platforms. ‘Intent to destabilise country’ “This is not the first time Meta has done such a thing. In January, Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg had said that PM Modi lost the 2024 election. He is still our Prime Minister, so which election is he talking about?

Zuckerberg had later apologised for his remarks. This shows that his intention is to destabilise the country,” Mr. Dubey said. Referring to the recent episode involving Mr. Modi’s Facebook post, he said, “When a video of the Prime Minister of India can be removed, and they themselves admitted that the content was missing for five hours, from 12.30 a.m. to 5 a.m., it raises serious questions.” ‘Algorithm bias’ The committee, according to sources, questioned Meta representatives about what several members described as “algorithm bias”, that allegedly allowed objectionable content to circulate while restricting the Prime Minister’s post. Meta officials apologised for the incident and expressed regret before the panel, the sources said. Opposition members, it is learnt, pushed back against this line of questioning, arguing that content moderation decisions on social media platforms should not be subject to political influence.

While raising their own concerns about Meta, particularly on issues of privacy and compliance with Indian laws, they maintained that criticism of the government could not be equated with anti-national content. Congress MP Shafi Parambil is learnt to have told the meeting that “technology should be regulated, not democracy”, while emphasising that dissent could not be criminalised. Two demands Dubey said the committee had conveyed two demands to the company. “The apology should come from Mr. Zuckerberg. If Mr. Zuckerberg does not apologise, then the ‘safe harbour’ protection under Section 79 should be withdrawn,” he said. Dubey, in his opening remarks at the meeting, also demanded that Meta provide a complete audit trail of the post, from “report to restoration.” He said that the restriction on the post underscored the need for greater oversight of Meta’s content moderation processes, automated systems and recommendation algorithms.