Karnataka High Court stays SIT formed to probe allegations of land encroachment against Art of Living

Published 3 August 2026 · local

The High Court of Karnataka has stayed a Government Order (GO) constituting a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe allegations of large-scale land encroachment against

The High Court of Karnataka has stayed a Government Order (GO) constituting a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe allegations of large-scale land encroachment against the Art of Living Foundation (AoL) and several affiliates of the AoL. Justice E.S. Indiresh passed the interim order on a petition filed by Ved Vignan Maha Vidya Peeth Trust, an affiliate of the AoL, Bengaluru. The petitioner has challenged the legality of the GO issued on July 17, 2026, constituting the SIT comprising various officers, including the Regional Commissioner, Bengaluru Division, and a retired District Judge serving as Legal Adviser to the Revenue Department. The SIT was tasked with investigating alleged land encroachment by the trust, the Art of Living Foundation, and others in Survey No. 46 of Kaggalipura village and surrounding areas. Appearing for the petitioner, Senior Advocate Sriranga S.

submitted that the petitioner and the AoL had made numerous representations to the revenue authorities seeking Podi and Hudbast (boundary determination and survey) of its lands, but no action had been taken. The authorities cannot conclude that there has been encroachment of government land without first fixing the boundaries in accordance with law and conducting a joint survey of the lands, he argued. It has been contended in the petition, filed through advocate Sumana Naganand, that the SIT was constituted without jurisdiction, as Section 195 of the Karnataka Land Revenue (KLR) Act, 1964, only permits delegation of powers to officers subordinate to the government, and does not provide for the constitution of an SIT. Similarly, Section 8 of the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition (KLGP) Act, 2011, only authorises the government to appoint an officer not below the rank of Tahsildar for the administration and implementation of the Act, and does not empower it to create an investigative body.

The petition further pointed out that even Shirastedars have been appointed as members of the SIT, though the law does not authorise the appointment of an officer below the rank of a Tahsildar. It was also contended that the appointment of a retired District Judge as a “Litigation Management Consultant” for the SIT is contrary to the provisions of the KLR and KLGP Acts. It has been contended in the petition that the special court constituted under the KLGP Act has the power to take cognisance of land encroachments, but the Government, without initiating any proceedings before the special court, has arbitrarily constituted the SIT. Pointing out that the GO refers to a report submitted by the Regional Commissioner, Amlan Aditya Biswas, who, on July 7, wrote to the Government stating that the trust and others had prima facie encroached upon government land, the petition contends that appointing the same Regional Commissioner as the head of the SIT is discriminatory in nature.