Vadilal vs Vadilal: Family feud refuses to melt away | TheBriefWire
Vadilal vs Vadilal: Family feud refuses to melt away
Published 2 August 2026 ยท local
Synopsis The Mumbai faction had originally approached the court under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, seeking interim relief. It alleged that the
Synopsis The Mumbai faction had originally approached the court under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, seeking interim relief. It alleged that the Ahmedabad faction had attempted to terminate agreements that allowed the Mumbai branch to manufacture and sell ice cream and juices under the Vadilal name in Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala and undivided Andhra Pradesh.
Published: August 3, 2026 โข 12:37 AM IST ยท Updated: August 3, 2026 โข 2:39 PM ISTBy TheBriefWire Editorial Team
Key points
Synopsis The Mumbai faction had originally approached the court under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, seeking interim relief.
It alleged that the Ahmedabad faction had attempted to terminate agreements that allowed the Mumbai branch to manufacture and sell ice cream and juices under the Vadilal name in Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala and undivided Andhra Pradesh.