Why has Trump halted Iran attacks, and what is the deal he is hinting at?
Trump insists ‘perimeters of a deal has been agreed to’ as he pauses attacks on Iran. But is there any substance to his claim? United
Trump insists ‘perimeters of a deal has been agreed to’ as he pauses attacks on Iran. But is there any substance to his claim? United States President Donald Trump says the US and Israel have agreed to halt new attacks on Iran, provided a deal to end the months-long conflict is reached “rapidly”. The region has been on edge, fearing that the fighting could escalate once again after Washington and Tehran traded threats of renewed heavy attacks, including against energy infrastructure. Trump said on his Truth Social platform early on Sunday in Iran and late on Saturday in the US that Iran and other Middle Eastern countries asked him to hold off on the attacks because “the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to”. Iran denied Trump’s claim that Tehran asked the US to refrain from conducting new strikes. Citing military officials, the agency said the allegation “was nothing but a new lie” and that the Iranian armed forces were “on high alert and ready for any eventuality”. Meanwhile, the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway critical to global energy supplies, remains shut, and shipping is disrupted as well in the Red Sea by the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen. Here is all you need to know about where the war stands on its 156th day Why has Trump halted attacks? Trump earlier said in his post that the US was “locked and loaded and ready to go against the Islamic Republic of Iran” but Tehran and other Middle Eastern countries asked him to hold off on new attacks. “Based on this request, I have agreed, for the future benefit of the WORLD and, likewise, the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran, to cancel the attack, subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL,” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. He said the deal “would include the Immediate, Complete, and Total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT, and an end to Iran’s nuclear threat”. “The Country of Israel joins me in this commitment. Get to work, everybody, and get it DONE,” he wrote in the post. Trump and the White House did not offer any further details on what the deal would entail and who is mediating it.
Meanwhile, the US news website Axios reported that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) spoke with Trump on Saturday and expressed concern over his plans for large new attacks against Iran. MBS reportedly urged Trump to de-escalate and refrain from launching the attacks. Another issue plaguing Washington is the depleting stocks of munitions, and more importantly, the Patriot anti-missile interceptors The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimates that US Patriot interceptor inventories have fallen from about 2,300 before the war with Iran to fewer than 827. “We have depleted our interceptors… which are, obviously, necessary to protect American troops,” Democratic US Senator Chris Van Hollen told the US-based ABC network. “We are depleting these every day, despite the fact that we could face other potential conflicts around the world.” US media outlets have reported that General Dan Caine, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, has raised concerns about falling US interceptor supplies. Trump has dismissed these concerns. What is the Iranian position? Tehran has not officially responded to Trump saying he had suspended the planned attacks or on the discussions to reach a deal. Iran’s acting defence minister, Majid Ibn al-Reza, on Sunday said Tehran sees every threat from its adversaries as “real and credible”, even if it is made as part of psychological warfare, state media reported. “We will neither be caught off-guard nor remain passive,” he said, adding that Iran would use threats as a basis to increase its military readiness, strengthen deterrence and enhance its military capabilities. Last week, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi spoke with Pakistan’s military chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir; Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan; and Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud in separate phone calls to discuss the risks of further US escalation. Speaking to Munir and Fidan, Araghchi said Iran would respond decisively to any “aggression” and discussed the consequences of “destabilising actions” by the US and how they could affect the Gulf, according to Araghchi’s Telegram account. Iran also warned Washington against any “adventurous action” and said it would retaliate decisively if US forces followed through on Trump’s threats of new attacks on Iranian targets.
The BriefWire