Saurav Das’ single-word reaction to Supreme Court’s decision on pellet guns sparks outrage, ‘Face the consequence’

Published 30 July 2026 · local

Saurav Das posted a single-word response to the Supreme Court’s directive on the use of pellet guns. The CJP spokesperson’s response has garnered nearly 2.4

Saurav Das posted a single-word response to the Supreme Court’s directive on the use of pellet guns. The CJP spokesperson’s response has garnered nearly 2.4 lakh views. The Supreme Court has ruled that pellet guns cannot be banned outright. It says existing advisory permits their use in exceptional circumstances. Security agencies retain authority specifically for crowd control situations. However, allegations of specific misuse can be examined individually. The case stems from a plea concerning recent student protests. Protesters gathered in Delhi against the NEET paper leak. The court has asked the Centre to preserve RAF ammunition logs. This covers deployment at Jantar Mantar during the protests. Quick answers to key questions • 5 QUESTIONS 1 What was the Supreme Court's ruling on the use of pellet guns during protests? ⌵ The Supreme Court ruled that pellet guns cannot be outright banned and may be used in exceptional circumstances for crowd control, while allowing for individual cases of misuse to be examined. 2 Why did Saurav Das react strongly to the Supreme Court's decision on pellet guns? ⌵ Saurav Das expressed his outrage through a post stating the court's decision was 'disgusting', highlighting concerns over the use of pellet guns against student protesters during the recent protests against the NEET paper leak. 3 How does the Supreme Court define the circumstances under which pellet guns can be used?

⌵ The Supreme Court stated that police are permitted to use pellet guns in exceptional situations, emphasizing that those wishing to challenge this should target the police regulations directly. 4 What context led to the Supreme Court hearing regarding pellet guns? ⌵ The Supreme Court hearing stemmed from a plea about the use of pellet guns during student protests in Delhi, where demonstrators claimed they were harmed by police using these weapons. 5 Should the use of pellet guns in crowd control be reconsidered according to the recent court proceedings? ⌵ Yes, the Supreme Court indicated it is open to examining the use of pellet guns in specific instances, urging a discussion on the necessity and regulations governing their deployment during protests. “Disgusting,” Saurav Das wrote while sharing the SC judgment. His response has sparked outrage. “First, disrespect the union government, then disrespect the apex court, then disrespect law, authority and constitution. And, it goes on,” wrote one user. “You are living in a country, holding a copy of the Constitution with the promise to uphold it, and now you are disgusting SC and (as constitutional authorities) just because it doesn’t suit you,” wrote another user. Another user commented, “The entire march was disgusting. You guys thought you would walk free, as it happened in Nepal and Bangladesh?