Lok Sabha passes stricter anti-paper leak bill after NEET uproar
The Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed a bill to amend a 2024 law, strengthening the legal framework against examination malpractices by enhancing punishments, providing for
The Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed a bill to amend a 2024 law, strengthening the legal framework against examination malpractices by enhancing punishments, providing for time-bound investigation and trial, and mandating special fast track courts for speedy disposal of cases. The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 comes in the wake of nationwide student protests over alleged examination irregularities that culminated in the resignation of education minister Dharmendra Pradhan last week. The bill amends the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, which was introduced to curb unfair means in public examinations conducted by specified central authorities. According to the statement of objects and reasons of the bill, the amendments seek to strengthen fairness, enhance the credibility of the public examination system, and facilitate time-bound investigation and speedy trial. The statement also refers to the cancellation and subsequent re-conduct of the NEET-UG 2026 examination—used for admission to undergraduate medical courses—after a paper leak. Quick answers to key questions • 5 QUESTIONS 1 What does the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 aim to achieve? ⌵ The bill aims to strengthen the legal framework against examination malpractices by enhancing punishments, ensuring time-bound investigations and trials, and establishing special fast track courts for quicker case resolutions. 2 Why was the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 introduced? ⌵ The bill was introduced following nationwide student protests over alleged examination irregularities, particularly after a paper leak issue related to the NEET-UG 2026 examination. 3 How will the amendment affect penalties for examination malpractices?
⌵ The amendment substantially increases penalties, with imprisonment for individuals using unfair means raised from three to ten years and fines increased from ₹10 lakh to ₹50 lakh. 4 What are the key features of the fast track courts established under the new amendment? ⌵ The fast track courts will exclusively handle cases related to examination malpractices, requiring investigations to be completed within two months and trials to be conducted on a day-to-day basis, concluding within three months from chargesheet filing. 5 Should students be concerned about future examination integrity after this bill? ⌵ Yes, the bill reflects a government commitment to safeguarding examination integrity, aiming to improve the reliability of public examinations and reduce occurrences of malpractices. The amendment substantially increases penalties for offences under the law. Individuals found using unfair means will now face imprisonment ranging from five to ten years, compared with the existing three to five years, while the maximum fine has been increased from ₹10 lakh to ₹50 lakh. For service providers involved in examination malpractices, the maximum fine has been raised from ₹1 crore to ₹5 crore. Directors, senior management and persons in charge of such service providers will face imprisonment ranging from five to ten years instead of the existing three to ten years. Punishment for organised crime has also been made more stringent. The minimum imprisonment has been increased from five years to seven years, while the minimum fine has been enhanced from ₹1 crore to ₹10 crore. The amendment bill also doubles the period of debarment for service providers found guilty of unfair means from four years to eight years.
The BriefWire