Should One Court Case Define You Forever? Why Delhi HC Backs Right To Be Forgotten
Key points
- Should One Court Case Define You Forever?
- Why Delhi HC Backs Right To Be Forgotten Written By, Last Updated: June 02, 2026, 11:10 IST The Delhi High Court's 144-page judgment is the first detailed attempt to establish clear principles for dealing with personal information embedded in online judicial records Rapid Read The judgment arose from a batch of petitions where people argued that even after cases ended in their favour, internet searches of their names continued to throw up court orders, news reports and legal documents.
- (AI-Generated Image) In a landmark ruling that could reshape digital privacy in India, the Delhi High Court has formally recognised the “right to be forgotten" as part of the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.
- The judgment, delivered by Justice Sachin Datta while deciding a batch of more than 30 petitions, lays down a detailed framework for when individuals can...
Quick Summary
Should One Court Case Define You Forever? Why Delhi HC Backs Right To Be Forgotten Written By, Last Updated: June 02, 2026, 11:10 IST The
Why It Matters
This development is important because it may impact public opinion, policy decisions, and future developments related to Should One Court Case Define You Forever? Why Delhi HC Backs.
Key Takeaways
- Should One Court Case Define You Forever?
- Why Delhi HC Backs Right To Be Forgotten Written By, Last Updated: June 02, 2026, 11:10 IST The Delhi High Court's 144-page judgment is the first detailed attempt to establish clear principles for dealing with personal information embedded in online judicial records Rapid Read The judgment arose from a batch of petitions where people argued that even after cases ended in their favour, internet searches of their names continued to throw up court orders, news reports and legal documents.
- (AI-Generated Image) In a landmark ruling that could reshape digital privacy in India, the Delhi High Court has formally recognised the “right to be forgotten" as part of the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.
- The judgment, delivered by Justice Sachin Datta while deciding a batch of more than 30 petitions, lays down a detailed framework for when individuals can seek the masking, de-indexing or removal of their personal information from online judicial records, Live Law reported.
- The ruling also directs search engines such as Google and legal databases such as Indian Kanoon to disable name-based searches in certain categories of cases.
📌 Source: News18
The BriefWire