Israelâs approval of limited Gaza force a calculated manoeuvre, experts say
Analysts say the Israeli cabinetâs decision aims to deflect US pressure and fragment the Gaza Strip. Months after the United Nations Security Council backed a
Analysts say the Israeli cabinetâs decision aims to deflect US pressure and fragment the Gaza Strip. Months after the United Nations Security Council backed a comprehensive framework to end Israelâs genocidal war on Gaza, Israelâs security cabinet has approved a highly constrained pilot project to allow foreign security forces into a narrow pocket of the devastated territory. Israeli media reported on Sunday that the so-called International Stabilization Force (ISF), part of United States President Donald Trumpâs 20-point âpeace planâ, will include 200 members from countries such as Morocco and Uganda deploying to a designated âtestâ zone in the southern city of Rafah. While international officials have welcomed the move, analysts describe the limited deployment as a calculated diplomatic gesture with little practical effect that comes as the US-backed peace process has largely stalled and as Israelâs deadly attacks continue. Instead of a genuine transition towards peace, they argue, the move is a political manoeuvre designed to deflect US pressure ahead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahuâs visit to Washington this week, while simultaneously entrenching the geographic fragmentation of the Gaza Strip. âNetanyahu is going to Washington to say ânoâ to the broader demands of withdrawalâ from the Strip, says Wissam Afifa, a Gaza-based political analyst. âInstead, he is offering this alternative: âTake this small appetiser, take this minor achievement, and play within this highly restricted space.'â Scaled-back forces and ârubber batonsâ The Israeli daily Haaretz reported that the original plan anticipated the deployment of 500 Moroccan troops to a refugee camp in the city. The drastic reduction to just 200 troops may indicate that Israelâs political-security cabinet has decided to divide the deployment into even smaller, heavily controlled stages. The force will operate in full coordination with the Israeli military. According to the Israeli news outlet Ynet, Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir was the sole cabinet member to vote against the measure, arguing that the Palestinian group Hamas had failed to fulfill its commitment to disarm and insisting that âthe solution in Gaza is to encourage migrationâ.
Israeli media also reported that the government maintains that the Israeli military will retain control of the âYellow Lineâ â a unilaterally imposed boundary that effectively places up to 70 percent of the Gaza Strip under tight Israeli control â and that no withdrawal will take place until Hamas has fully disarmed. The original framework endorsed by UNSC Resolution 2803 called for the deployment of an international force alongside a transitional Palestinian administration. Earlier this month, Hamas announced it would dissolve its government in Gaza and hand over power to a new, Palestinian technocratic governing authority called the Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG). Analysts said Hamasâs move was likely designed to apply pressure on Israel and demonstrate the groupâs commitment to handing over governance and allowing the rebuilding of the territory. The pilot programme also envisions the NCAGâs entry to oversee civil affairs in Gaza. Yet, according to Haaretz, the Palestinian police accompanying them will be stripped of firearms, permitted to carry only ârubber batons and tasersâ. Meanwhile, preparations on the ground appear to be moving forward to accommodate this new security architecture. Israeli Army Radio recently broadcast a video showing a military base under construction in the southern âGaza envelopeâ near the Karem Abu Salem (Kerem Shalom) crossing. The station reported that the sprawling facility is being built specifically to host the incoming multinational forces before their deployment. Despite the severe Israeli restrictions, Nickolay Mladenov, the high representative for the Board of Peace, welcomed the Israeli cabinetâs decision, praising it as a âcritical part of the agreed framework for stabilizing Gaza, supporting demilitarization, and enabling the transition to effective Palestinian transitional administrationâ. A âsweetenerâ for Washington To understand the timing and motivation behind the decision, experts pointed to the diplomatic deadlock surrounding the US-brokered peace initiative.
