As Dharmendra Pradhan faces resignation calls, a look at India's most notable moral resignations
As tensions remain high across India and especially in New Delhi over the NEET paper leak and police crackdown on protestors, demands of Education Minister
As tensions remain high across India and especially in New Delhi over the NEET paper leak and police crackdown on protestors, demands of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation continue to grow louder with every passing day. The central government, however, has not yet softened its stance on the issue. Pradhan continues in his position and has recently lashed out at Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi, claiming that he continues "to shamelessly exploit students as political tools to manufacture disruption during the Monsoon Session of Parliament." While Pradhan himself has not shown any inclination to voluntarily resign, Indian political history has seen ministers step down after accepting moral responsibility for major mishaps or unfortunate incidents in their departments. Here are some notable examples Lal Bahadur Shastri Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri was India's Railway and Transport minister in the Jawaharlal Nehru cabinet. It was during his tenure that the Ariyalur train disaster happened on 23 November 1956 in Tamil Nadu when a passenger train plunged into a river after a bridge near Ariyalur collapsed, resulting in the death of around 140 to 150 individuals. Quick answers to key questions • 5 QUESTIONS 1 What are some notable moral resignations in Indian politics related to major incidents? ⌵ Notable moral resignations in India include Lal Bahadur Shastri after the Ariyalur train disaster, TT Krishnamachari following the Mundhra financial scam, and V K Krishna Menon during the 1962 Sino-India war, highlighting ministers taking responsibility for their departments' failures.
2 Why are there calls for Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation? ⌵ Calls for Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation stem from the NEET paper leak incident, where many believe he should be held accountable for the systemic failures in the education system that led to the crisis. 3 How have political figures historically handled moral responsibility in India? ⌵ Political figures in India often resign to accept moral responsibility for significant incidents, suggesting accountability and a commitment to principles, even when not directly at fault, as seen in several historical cases. 4 How did public sentiment influence the resignations of ministers in India? ⌵ Public sentiment has been a powerful driver for resignations in India, as seen when ministers faced immense pressure and criticism from the public and opposition parties after major mishaps, leading them to step down. 5 Should ministers be held morally responsible for events in their departments? ⌵ The debate continues on whether ministers should bear moral responsibility for departmental failures; proponents argue it ensures accountability, while opponents see it as unfair for issues beyond their direct control. After the disaster, Shastri said that despite him not being personally responsible for the failure, he should take moral as well as political responsibility for the same and resign. Shastri had made such an offer after an earlier train accident as well, but Pt Nehru persuaded him to stay.
The BriefWire