Meta layoffs: US judge rejects bid to halt AI discrimination job cuts
A US judge has refused to temporarily stop Meta from laying off workers who claim they were unfairly selected for job cuts by the company's
A US judge has refused to temporarily stop Meta from laying off workers who claim they were unfairly selected for job cuts by the company's AI tools, according to a Reuters report. US District Judge William Orrick on Friday ruled that he would not stop Meta from carrying out its layoffs starting on July 22, even as the merits of the workers' legal claims are decided through private arbitration. The judge noted that the workers were not able to show that losing their jobs at Meta amounted to "irreparable harm" that would require him to issue an emergency order blocking the layoffs. The complainants said in a joint statement that while the judge denied their request, he also recognised that the case raises "serious questions" about Meta's conduct.
"The Court expressly stated that it may reconsider its determinations 'based on any additional evidence the parties provide regarding whether and how AI was used' in the reduction in force," the employees were quoted as saying in the joint statement by Reuters. What are the allegations against Meta? The lawsuit was filed by 26 current and former Meta employees earlier this week and alleged that the tech giant relied on AI tools to measure productivity and AI token usage while disadvantaging people who had missed work owing to medical conditions or to care for their family members. The company also allegedly relied on performance reviews that were based in part on employees' adoption of AI. The employees claim that Meta used a number of AI-assisted systems to score and rank employees during its latest round of layoffs.
These reportedly included an AI model assistant known as 'Metamate', which allegedly worked as an employee-trained "second brain" and tracked workers' communications and documents, along with a productivity score that was generated by scanning keystrokes, screen activity, emails and browser history. They also allege that Meta did not pause these AI systems even when employees were on vacation or legally protected leave. These scores were allegedly then used as inputs for layoff selection. Notably, Meta announced the layoffs in May as part of its broader efforts to increase investment in artificial intelligence. The layoffs affected nearly 8,000 employees, or around 10% of Meta's global workforce. Also Read | Meta Workers Accuse It of Using AI to Conduct Discriminatory Layoffs What did the judge say?
The employees had asked Orrick for a temporary restraining order that would block Meta from completing its layoffs while they pursued their claims in private arbitration. However, while their motion for a preliminary injunction is still pending, the judge on Friday suggested that he could change his mind after he has more information about the layoffs. The lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that the workers could lose valuable stock options and their health insurance along with their jobs and salaries.
The BriefWire