Who gets convicted in Nigeria's anti-corruption war?

The recent conviction of e power minister Saleh Mamman has rekindled debate over who is held accountable in Nigeria. Saleh Mamman, a former Nigerian minister of power was arrested on Tuesday, days after he was sentenced in absentia to 75 years in prison for laundering 33.8 billion naira ($24.6 million), in what was widely described as a rare high-profile conviction. Prosecutors said the funds were proceeds of unlawful activity linked to government-financed hydroelectric projects, including Nigeria's Mambilla and Zungerupower plants. Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) chief Ola Olukoyede said that Mamman, who had been in hiding since his May 7 conviction, was arrested in the northern Nigerian city of Kaduna and was now in custody. Mamman had served as minister of power between 2015 and 2021, at a time when then-President Muhammadu Buhari's administration had vowed to fight corruption. The judge also ordered him to pay back an outstanding sum of 22 billion naira to the state. Do convictions signal real accountability? Weeks earlier, former acting accountant-general Chukwunyere Nwabuoku was handed a 72-year prison sentence after being convicted of money laundering. They joined a growing list of former public officials prosecuted over corruption allegations running into billions of naira. Nigeria's anti-graft agency, the EFCC, recently declared the former Humanitarian Affairs Minister wanted over alleged abuse of office and diversion of public funds. But beyond this, there are broader questions about who actually gets convicted in Nigeria's justice system. Backlog of cases Corruption cases against public officials in Nigeria often stall in the courts, sometimes taking years — or even decades — to conclude. According to a review of 393 corruption cases between 2013 and 2026 by Dataphyte, a research organization, only 144 have reached final judgment, leaving more than 60% still pending at various stages of trial. These cases, spanning 14 years, are linked to 3.61 trillion naira, $1.33 billion, and €26,170 in alleged corruption. "Further analysis shows that most cases concluded so far involve appointed officials, suggesting that convictions are less common among those elected into office than those appointed," Dataphyte said. Reporting by Nigerian news portal TheCable underscores this disparity. While 33 former governors have been prosecuted, only six have been convicted. Some convictions were later overturned on appeal or pardoned. Corruption on the rise worldwide, watchdog finds To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Analysts say recent convictions of senior public officials may signal a push towards greater accountability efforts. However, David Alechenu, a team lead at the Nigeria Anti-Corruption Agencies Strengthening Project, cautioned that "isolated convictions alone are not enough to conclude that the anti-corruption fight has become fully effective." "The real test is whether these efforts are becoming systematic, preventive, or institutionalized," he added. Why corruption cases stall in Nigeria Dataphyte's analysis points to a wide disparity in prosecutions: "324 appointed officials have been charged, compared with just 35 former governors, and many high-profile cases have taken between 6 and 15 years to conclude," it said. Because of the structure of Nigeria's justice system, cases involving elected officials are often more layered and rigorous than those against appointed officials — a gap often exploited to the advantage of the former, analysts have noted. "Where there is clear evidence of a crime, the strategy is often to keep delaying until they can negotiate a settlement or until a favourable government comes into power and offers some form of relief," said Amina Umaru Miango, a legal expert and project manager at the Center for Journalism Innovation and Development (CJID). "That is what we often see," she told DW. "These individuals can afford top lawyers, are politically exposed, and have the connections needed to prolong the process." How corruption kills Kenya's babies To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Meanwhile, Alechenu argues that it's more of a structural issue than a single institutional weakness. He said elected officials control larger budgets and patronage networks, meaning cases often "involve multiple accounts, agencies and sometimes cross-border transactions and complex assets tracing that naturally extend investigations and prosecutorial timelines." Alechenu added that those involving appointed officials are usually more administratively contained. The analysts said these loopholes allow for sustained political influence and undermine the overall anti-corruption efforts. This, they say, also reduces public confidence in the justice system. Ahmad Adedimeji Amobi, a writer based in the Nigerian city of Osogbo, said that co